57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Continental SportContact 7

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Continental
SportContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
16
4
4
1
16
Optimale Position
#3
#3
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
12.0
3.3
1.0
1.2
Neuester Test
2023
2025
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
111
40
27
124

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental SportContact 7
87%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental SportContact 7
94%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental SportContact 7
96%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental SportContact 7
86%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental SportContact 7
85%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Continental SportContact 7
75%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Continental SportContact 7
81%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen