57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
16
4
3
6
1
3
Optimale Position
#3
#3
#2
#3
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
12.0
3.3
4.7
1.0
3.7
Neuester Test
2023
2025
2026
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
153
111
40
146
64
34

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich