57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
16
4
3
3
14
1
Optimale Position
#3
#3
#2
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
12.0
3.3
3.7
3.6
1.0
Neuester Test
2023
2025
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
153
111
40
34
188
64

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich