56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
16
4
18
1
6
5
Optimale Position
#3
#3
#1
#1
#3
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
12.0
6.1
1.0
4.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2023
2025
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
153
111
47
64
146
63

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich