57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
16
4
18
3
6
1
Optimale Position
#3
#3
#1
#2
#3
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
12.0
6.1
3.7
4.7
1.0
Neuester Test
2023
2025
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
153
111
47
34
146
64

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich