57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental UltraContact gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
16
4
1
6
4
Optimale Position
#3
#3
#7
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
12.0
7.0
4.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2023
2025
2023
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
111
87
146
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen