57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
16
4
14
1
4
Optimale Position
#3
#3
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
12.0
3.6
1.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2023
2025
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
111
194
66
40

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich