57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformancePremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

3.8
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Hankook ION FlexClimateObere-Mittelklasse
HankookHankook

ION FlexClimate

9.0
R17 – R21
Firestone Roadhawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.7
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
16
4
1
6
28
Optimale Position
#3
#2
#1
#3
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
3.3
1.0
4.7
2.3
Neuester Test
2023
2026
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
40
27
146
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Beste -Reifen für ElektrofahrzeugeBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Auch vergleichen

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Continental UltraContactGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Dunlop Sport BluResponseGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Cooper ZEON CS8Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianContinentalKumhoVredesteinNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen