57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Kleber Quadraxer 3 gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Kleber
Quadraxer 3
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Anzahl der Tests
16
4
3
13
24
Optimale Position
#3
#2
#2
#4
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
3.3
3.7
6.3
2.7
Neuester Test
2023
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
153
40
36
116
151

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich