57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
16
6
28
3
4
Optimale Position
#3
#3
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
4.7
2.3
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2023
2026
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
146
67
36
40

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich