56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
16
14
10
4
3
Optimale Position
#3
#8
#2
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
13.4
6.0
12.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2023
2026
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
153
104
111
40

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich