57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Nokian Powerproof 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Nokian
Powerproof 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
18
3
14
4
5
Optimale Position
#1
#6
#8
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
9.0
13.4
3.3
2.8
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
91
153
40
139

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Nokian Powerproof 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen