57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Nexen N Fera Primus gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Nexen
N Fera Primus
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
18
6
4
4
6
Optimale Position
#1
#10
#3
#2
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
12.7
12.0
3.3
4.7
Neuester Test
2024
2024
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
66
111
40
146

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Nexen N Fera Primus
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Nexen N Fera Primus
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Nexen N Fera Primus
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Nexen N Fera Primus
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Nexen N Fera Primus
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Nexen N Fera Primus
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Nexen N Fera Primus
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Nexen N Fera Primus
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Nexen N Fera Primus
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Nexen N Fera Primus
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Nexen N Fera Primus
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Nexen N Fera Primus
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Nexen N Fera Primus
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Nexen N Fera Primus
59%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Nexen N Fera Primus
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen