57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
18
5
5
4
6
3
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#1
#2
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
4.8
2.2
3.3
4.7
3.7
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
158
63
40
146
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen