57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
18
13
3
5
4
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
4.3
3.7
2.8
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
123
36
139
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin Primacy 4+
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen