57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
18
4
3
23
5
Optimale Position
#1
#3
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
12.0
3.7
3.3
2.8
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
111
36
176
139

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich