57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
18
4
3
6
5
1
Optimale Position
#1
#3
#2
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
12.0
3.7
4.7
2.2
1.0
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2025
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
111
36
146
63
66

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen