57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
18
4
3
4
1
Optimale Position
#1
#3
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
12.0
1.3
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
111
23
40
66

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich