56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
18
4
2
6
3
Optimale Position
#1
#3
#1
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
12.0
1.0
4.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
111
23
146
40

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich