57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Michelin CrossClimate 2Premium
MichelinMichelin

CrossClimate 2

9.1
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
18
24
4
1
3
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
2.7
3.3
1.0
3.7
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
150
40
66
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Beste -Reifen für ElektrofahrzeugeBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
VS
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71
VS
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Auch vergleichen

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.PrimacyMichelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate+

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliMichelinHankookGoodyearNokianFalkenVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenMaxxisBridgestone

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen