57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
18
24
3
4
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
2.7
1.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
151
23
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen