57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Dunlop Winter

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Dunlop
Winter
Anzahl der Tests
18
3
14
4
2
Optimale Position
#1
#4
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
4.3
3.6
3.3
1.5
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
99
194
40
66

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Dunlop Winter
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen