57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Dunlop Winter gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Dunlop
Winter
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Anzahl der Tests
18
10
4
2
14
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
6.0
3.3
1.5
3.6
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
109
40
66
194

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen