57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
18
10
16
4
5
4
3
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#3
#3
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
6.0
5.5
12.0
2.2
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2023
2025
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
109
153
111
63
40
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen