57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kleber Dynaxer HP4 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Hankook
ION Evo
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
18
11
1
6
4
4
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#1
#3
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
11.6
1.0
4.7
3.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2024
2025
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
122
66
146
40
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen