57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Hankook ION FlexClimateObere-Mittelklasse
HankookHankook

ION FlexClimate

9.0
R17 – R21
Firestone RoadhawkObere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.7
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.7
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
18
1
21
4
28
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
1.0
11.9
3.3
2.3
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
27
165
40
67

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Reifen für ElektroautosBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Auch vergleichen

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcorunGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageFirestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNFirestone Roadhawk vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich