57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
18
1
4
3
6
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#2
#2
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
1.0
3.3
3.7
4.7
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
66
40
36
146

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook ION Evo
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen