57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GT RADIAL ClimateActive gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Anzahl der Tests
18
3
10
4
24
Optimale Position
#1
#5
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
7.3
6.0
3.3
2.7
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
59
109
40
151

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen