57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Anzahl der Tests
18
24
14
10
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
2.7
3.6
6.0
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
302
194
109

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen