56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Michelin e.Primacy

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Michelin
e.Primacy
Anzahl der Tests
18
3
10
14
4
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#2
#8
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
3.3
6.0
13.4
12.0
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
40
104
153
111

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich