57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
18
5
24
3
1
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
2.2
2.7
3.7
1.0
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
63
151
36
66

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen