56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
18
21
3
3
2
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
11.9
3.7
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2024
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
164
34
40
23

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich