57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
18
3
3
1
4
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
3.7
1.3
1.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
36
23
66
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen