57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
18
1
13
4
6
Optimale Position
#1
#7
#1
#2
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
7.0
4.3
3.3
4.7
Neuester Test
2024
2023
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
88
123
40
146

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental UltraContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen