57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
18
1
13
4
3
Optimale Position
#1
#7
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
7.0
4.3
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2024
2023
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
88
123
40
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental UltraContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen