57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact
Hankook
ION Evo
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
18
1
1
6
4
Optimale Position
#1
#7
#1
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
7.0
1.0
4.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2023
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
88
66
146
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental UltraContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen