57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Ceat
4 SeasonDrive X5
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
18
2
14
6
4
Optimale Position
#1
#4
#8
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
6.0
13.4
4.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
153
146
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen