57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Anzahl der Tests
18
23
5
23
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
6.7
2.8
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
107
139
176

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen