57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Anzahl der Tests
18
14
21
16
15
Optimale Position
#1
#8
#2
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
13.4
11.9
5.5
9.0
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2024
2023
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
153
164
153
225

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich