57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
e.Primacy
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
21
4
13
4
3
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
12.0
4.3
3.3
1.3
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
165
111
123
40
23

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen