57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Anzahl der Tests
21
4
1
4
3
14
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#1
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
12.0
1.0
3.3
3.7
5.5
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2025
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
165
111
66
40
36
700

Nass

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
82%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
84%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
74%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
59%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
28%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich