58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Anzahl der Tests
21
4
4
24
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
12.0
3.3
2.7
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
165
111
40
302

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Nassfahrverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Trockenleistung
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.