Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Obere-Mittelklasse

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

Roadhawk

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Anzahl der Tests

21

4

5

3

1

Optimale Position

#2

#3

#1

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

11.9

12.0

2.2

3.7

3.3

1.0

Neuester Test

2024

2025

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

164

111

63

34

40

64

Nass

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - quer

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - längs

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Handling - nass

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Nassbremsen

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Kreisbahn nass

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Seitenführung

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Trocken

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Trockenbremsen

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Handling - trocken

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Komfort

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Außengeräusch

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Komfort

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Kosten

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rollwiderstand

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kilometerstand

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Preis-Wert

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Roadhawk

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen