57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
21
4
3
18
1
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
12.0
3.7
6.1
1.0
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2025
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
165
111
36
47
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen