57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
21
10
13
18
5
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
6.0
4.3
6.1
2.2
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2025
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
165
109
123
47
63

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen