57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleicher | Kontakt

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Firestone Roadhawk

Obere-Mittelklasse

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Obere-Mittelklasse

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

BFGoodrich Advantage

Obere-Mittelklasse

BFGoodrich

Advantage

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Auch vergleichen mit

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

Firestone

Roadhawk

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

BFGoodrich

Advantage

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Anzahl der Tests

21

10

14

3

Optimale Position

#2

#2

#8

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

11.9

6.0

13.4

3.3

Neuester Test

2024

2026

2026

2026

Verfügbare Größen

164

104

153

40

Nass

Nass

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - quer

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Aquaplaning - längs

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Nassbremsen

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Handling - nass

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kreisbahn nass

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Seitenführung

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Nassleistung

Firestone Roadhawk

24%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

55%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Trocken

Trocken

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Trockenbremsen

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Handling - trocken

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Trockenleistung

Firestone Roadhawk

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Komfort

Komfort

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Außengeräusch

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Innengeräusche

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Komfort

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Kosten

Kosten

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Rollwiderstand

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kilometerstand

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Preis-Wert

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen