57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Pirelli
Cinturato (C3)
Anzahl der Tests
21
4
16
4
7
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#3
#3
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
3.3
5.5
12.0
2.7
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2023
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
165
40
153
111
31

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
88%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
94%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
93%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
92%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
92%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
94%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
87%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
84%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
74%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
82%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
75%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
74%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
77%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen