57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
21
3
16
4
18
3
1
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#3
#3
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
3.3
5.5
12.0
6.1
3.7
1.0
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2023
2025
2024
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
164
40
153
111
47
34
64

Nass

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich