57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
21
4
3
24
5
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
3.3
3.7
2.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
165
40
36
151
63

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen