Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex

Obere-Mittelklasse

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Anzahl der Tests

21

5

3

1

3

Optimale Position

#2

#1

#2

#1

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

11.9

2.2

3.3

1.0

3.7

Neuester Test

2024

2025

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

164

63

40

64

34

Nass

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - quer

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - längs

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Handling - nass

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Nassbremsen

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Kreisbahn nass

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Trocken

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Trockenbremsen

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Handling - trocken

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Komfort

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Außengeräusch

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Komfort

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Innengeräusche

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Kosten

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rollwiderstand

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kilometerstand

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Preis-Wert

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen